Do you have a dog in this fight you're picking, or some inside knowledge you're not letting on about, maybe? You seem pretty sure of yourself, and deeply invested in the innocence of somebody you presumably don't know. Or am I making a mistaken presumption that you don't know Barak?
> Do you have a dog in this fight you're picking...
No more than you. The neurolinguistic programming is a nice touch, by disagreeing and providing a counter argument in a voluntary exchange of ideas - I have picked a fight and therefor become an aggressor!
> ...some inside knowledge you're not letting on about, maybe?
Probably the years spent in the military.
> You seem pretty sure of yourself, and deeply invested in the innocence of somebody you presumably don't know.
I am sure of myself, I have an easily defensible position founded on solid reasoning. What innocence are you talking about?
> Or am I making a mistaken presumption that you don't know Barak?
I do not know him or anybody that works for Komodia or Lenovo. Terms and conditions apply, this message may cause rectal hemorrhaging.
You're the aggressor because of how many times and how aggressively you've replied in this thread, not because I've neurolinguistically programmed you by analyzing which direction you dart your eyes or resort to rectal metaphors.
So what branch of which country's military do you get your mental conditioning from?
