Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>A hectare of land is a few hundred euros per year to rent

Acquiring land-use rights, permitting, environmental reviews, and zoning changes for an industrial power plant costs far more than the raw rent.

>Power consumption in the EU has flatlined

This is dangerously short-sighted, the mass adoption of electric vehicles and heat pumps will place enormous new demands on the grid.

> put the solar farms next to some of the shut down nuclear plants

Solar is much more land demanding than what the decommissioned sites of nuclear power plants can offer.



>Acquiring land-use rights, permitting, environmental reviews, and zoning changes for an industrial power plant costs far more than the raw rent.

So the argument against my claim that the government and market has failed if balcony solar is cost effective, is that the government is the problem?


This isn't a government failure. The government is correctly pricing the true cost of industrial land use: the loss of farmland and natural space.

Rooftop solar is cost-effective because it cleverly avoids that cost by using land that's already developed. It's not winning because of bureaucracy, but because it's using a limited resource in a smarter way.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: