You're not being charitable with the take. seems like you just switched "objective truth" with your flavor: "error rate"
what is an error? how does the llm "know"?
wikipedia example is good. i'd say its "truth" is based on human curated consensus. everyone gets that. what i don't get what's the llm analog? as you state, it's just about making the error rate go down, ok so what is an error? does it require human in the loop?
what is an error? how does the llm "know"?
wikipedia example is good. i'd say its "truth" is based on human curated consensus. everyone gets that. what i don't get what's the llm analog? as you state, it's just about making the error rate go down, ok so what is an error? does it require human in the loop?