Just watched the mother's interview where she presented an independently conducted investigation report on Tucker's show. Doesn't appear remotely close to a suicide.
Guy was hit in the head while brushing his teeth, sat in a sitting position and shot from above. Wonder how they can get to so many peeps in positions of authority. Coroner, local PD, attorneys were all compromised.
It's possible a large amount of people in the SF government are complicit in a coverup of a company-initiated murder. Or, alternatively, a grieving mother is an unreliable narrator and cherry-picking facts while being egged on by a sensationalist, anti-SF talking head.
I can't say for certain there's not more to this story. But I'd wait for more objective sources before I start to decide.
I feel like it's also important to remember that the truth may be something else completely.
I'm reminded of Bob Lee's killing, when many initial reactions assumed it was a random act of violence and blamed city leaders for progressive policies and decarceration, but it later turned out to be personally motivated [1][2].
Similarly, in this case, the truth may not be suicide nor company-initiated morder, but something else entirely.
Adding to the list of possibilities, it's also possible that a large amount of people in the SF government are just desensitized and jaded and have a thousand-yard-PTSD-stare from seeing so much death and despair and overdoses and crimes on a daily basis, and don't really have energy or capacity to accept that this case might not be more of the same.
During the mother's interview, she kept saying that it seemed unusual that the medical examiner only looked at the scene for a relatively short amount of time. But having lived in SF, and seeing the city services operate, it just seems completely expected to me.
The answer is that they didn't, and conspiracy theories like this are essentially always false. Try to imagine that it was a suicide, and then you'll realize that everything makes perfect sense.
The "evidence" seems pretty weak. A second autopsy that even the family's attorney admits is inconclusive... okay. Alleged "conflicts of interest" with the medical examiner... okay.
Seems very likely this guy was just depressed and his depression ended in tragedy. The motivated reasoning here from Musk, his family, and many others revolves around wanting to prove OpenAI is bad because they want OpenAI to be a bad guy they can pin this onto.
Not sure what OpenAI would possibly gain from this. It's not like LLMs being trained on pirated datasets is some sort of closely guarded secret.
The kind of weird, backwards consensus-making where betting market odds get used as proof for whatever fact or outcome they're betting on is... interesting.
Maybe the hard time limit is making people apprehensive. Not that I’m on the yes side, but maybe the odds would be different if the timeline was longer.
- Nothing in article content even close to matching the headline, or attempting to.
- No primary sources.
- Strong signs of being AI generated. (inter alia, "The case now unfolding is becoming the focus of most talks on ethics, accountability, and safety within the fast-evolving artificial intelligence world.")
You’ve got the wrong person, buddy! OP is referring to Gary Webb (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Webb), who died from two gunshot wounds to the head, with the death ruled a suicide.
Well, 'fun fact', it is entirely possible to miss yourself with the first bullet, only taking the face/jaw, and having to shoot a second time to cut out the pain.
Another 'fun fact', in rural areas in my country, where most firearms are long rifles used to hunt big game, 'suicide' are ruled when someone else (young kids in all cases I've heard off) pull the trigger for the person who wanted to off himself.
[Edit] And yes having a dozen cousins and aunts in healthcare, and another half a dozen being social workers means I have a lot of 'fun fact' to share.
Credit to the families for spending so much time and energy to get the appropriate attention on this case. However, I wonder if too much time has passed. If there was foul play, wouldn’t the criminals involved have had enough time to clean up their tracks?
> The SFPD and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner have withheld the full incident report and autopsy findings. The delay in releasing these documents, which typically must be completed within 90 days to maintain accreditation, has added to the controversy. Forty-three days after Balaji’s death, the investigation remains unresolved.
I've seen this on a few very sketchy (to my eyes at least) websites or Twitter accounts. Can't they link to some more official statement? How do we know SFPD changed the status of this case? So much misinformation these days, everyone with credibility needs to link to their sources (or if personally told by an informant, etc, at least make that clear).
This is Republic, an indian news channel, formed because Arnab Goswami (a high decibel tv debate anchor) parted ways with his previous channel for "editorial censorship" (read pressure from political parties).
The link is to a news aggregator (msn), which links to the main article from Republicbiz[1]. The hackernews guidelines suggest we should be using this link instead.
If rich people want you dead you will die and no one will bat an eyelash such is the way of the world sadly if you yourself want you dead you will also find a way such is the way of the world
Guy was hit in the head while brushing his teeth, sat in a sitting position and shot from above. Wonder how they can get to so many peeps in positions of authority. Coroner, local PD, attorneys were all compromised.