Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah that's exactly what I was saying. So what word would you use to mean "dynamically typed without static type annotations"?

> your tools yell at junior developers.

Oh you're one of those...



> one of those...

If by one of those you mean a solopreneur who doesn't have any junior devs to yell at then yes. If I wanted to use static types I'd use an actual statically typed language with all of the performance benefits (Go, Java, Rust, Haskell, Ocaml, etc...).

Using a dynamically typed/interpreted language with type annotations is literally the worst of all worlds...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: