So what you're saying is that the NYT was doing badly, then had a massive bounce...

		pessimizer on Sept 10, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: New York Times tech workers union votes to authori... So what you're saying is that the NYT was doing badly, then had a massive bounce-back. I am supposed to ignore the bounce-back, and accept the contraction that ended at least a half decade ago as an explanation for what is happening today. Why would I do this?