> That may be, but once in a while it'd be nice to pass something positively affirming specific rights that prevents anyone from easily trying again to take them away.
For the point of discourse, I'll point out that the "otherside" thinks the exact same thing.
There is a great irony in folks downvoting your comment when the original article is about an attempt to codify positive "rights" which would infringe upon the innate rights of everyone else.
For the point of discourse, I'll point out that the "otherside" thinks the exact same thing.