Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No. I'm a salaried employee. Marginal time/effort savings do not directly translate into more money for me.

I am also a salaried employee and if I can save a minute of work time that’s one less minute I have to work.

I have a body of work I need to complete and sometimes that takes me 40 hours and sometimes much more.

The only way I can think of that $20 per month for increased productivity doesn’t help is if your company’s metric of success is being present/working 8 hours per day.



Most jobs require you to be available for 8 hours. So you can't work hyper productively and then quit for the day at 2PM. You need to show up for the 4PM meeting as well as the continuous storm of incoming chats.

This is why productivity improvements feel so meh. For people that are hyper competitive and ambitious, it's a way to tackle more and bigger challenges. Fine.

For others though, the benefits do not really materialize in meaningful ways. Maybe you can win some slack/recovery time, but it's not really truly free time. You're still working and on call.

In fact, in quite a lot of teams being productive is actively punished. Say that in agile you do a great sprint, and execute 10 story points instead of the normal 5.

Nice. Oh...so you can do 10? 10 it is then for all the future sprints. Without a pay increase, obviously.


For people that are hyper competitive and ambitious, it's a way to tackle more and bigger challenges. Fine.

I agree that hyper competitive and ambitious people might do this. I would add though that curious and passionate people will also do this.

I'll be honest... if I weren't getting paid to be a software engineer I'd do it for free. Like I did when I was 13 years old with my 300 bps modem creating a BBS program.

This leads me to do all kinds of crazy things like work 6 hours on a Saturday because I am quite simply fascinated about the level of engineering I can do to turn an 18 hour batch process into 4.

It's been extremely lucrative for my career. I'm fortunate to work somewhere that is truly pay for performance. But not in a million years is that why I do it.


> The only way I can think of that $20 per month for increased productivity doesn’t help is if your company’s metric of success is being present/working 8 hours per day.

You've just described most office jobs.


The older I get the more I feel it doesn’t really matter. Somehow we’re all getting paid healthy salaries for playing office all day..


You don't need to complete the work. Your employer needs you to complete the work. If your employer gives you tools that make you work less optimally, they get less optimal work in return.


Exactly. It's entirely employer's responsibility to provide tools and equipment for the work, except perhaps stuff that you can keep, like tables, chairs and screens for home office. Only freelancers/entrepreneurs should pay for something like ChatGPT with their own money.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: