I prefer the encoded version of weather, TAF (Terminal Area Forecast). That makes it easier to visually scan down and see how the weather is forecast to change in the terminal area. (Is it improving? Getting worse? Is there a time when the winds change significantly [meaning a frontal passage is happening]?)
Same for a time sequence of METARs, especially when you cross-compare the METARs to the TAF (to know if the forecast is holding or was blown.)
Visually scanning the encoded text of weather is easier. (The entire NOTAM system is a mess, encoded or not.)
Here's Indy's METARs, showing generally good weather with broken clouds, developing into light rain-mist-solid overcast, then heavy rain-mist-overcast, then light rain-mist-broken clouds. (Read from bottom-up.) I'd quickly read that as improving and generally following the TAF (below it), meaning the forecast is probably a good one.
Same for a time sequence of METARs, especially when you cross-compare the METARs to the TAF (to know if the forecast is holding or was blown.)
Visually scanning the encoded text of weather is easier. (The entire NOTAM system is a mess, encoded or not.)
Raw TAF and Raw METAR for BOS below:
Here's Indy's METARs, showing generally good weather with broken clouds, developing into light rain-mist-solid overcast, then heavy rain-mist-overcast, then light rain-mist-broken clouds. (Read from bottom-up.) I'd quickly read that as improving and generally following the TAF (below it), meaning the forecast is probably a good one.