Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

the problem is that, in general that content made of "blood,sweat and tears" is already being pillaged by the robber barons who take 90%+ of the profit from your work, at least in the fields of movies, tv, music and books. Not saying anything is right or wrong. just pointing out this complicating factor.


There’s a serious citation needed on those numbers but even if they are accurate, theseauthors are not slaves. They voluntarily sign contracts rather than give their work away, self-publish, or stop writing. It seems rather self-serving to argue that you are better equipped to make that decision for them and that means you should get something you want without paying for it.


So by this logic, it's ok to further immiserate the poor author since she was already 90% immiserated by the big bad publisher?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: