Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is moving the print head in 3 axis the best approach? I'd imagine moving the print head in x and y and leaving z to the build surface easier.


You don't want to be moving the warm plastic..


I'm confused by this Q&A - I can't think of a hobbyist 3d printer design that doesn't move the build platform:

In the Printrbot it appears the print head moves in X & Z, and the build platform moves in Y. Same as the RepRap Mendel.

In the MakerBot the print head moves in Z, and the build platform in X&Y. In the Up! 3d printer the print head moves in X, build platform Y&Z. In the Ultimaker, print head X&Y, build platform Z (this is the combination that rbanffy describes.)

So that's a good bunch of possible permutations, but the build platform always moves...


The original RepRap design (Darwin) moved the print head in X and Y, and moved the build surface in Z only (downward as the print progresses).

The Ultimaker machine is based off the Darwin design, and works similarly. Ultimaker has a very lightweight printhead, so they can print incredibly fast.

I haven't seen a moving-head deposition robot that moves only the head. I think this is because the simplest way to make a 3-axis robot involves two tools/surfaces, each moving in at least 1 axis. A tool/surface that moves in all 3 axes needs to be very stiff to avoid juddering around as the machine starts and stops line segments. It's much simpler to make a 2-axis robot and a 1-axis robot, than a 3-axis robot. :)


Good point. You either have to move the warm plastic or the print head and its positioning mechanism... :-/

Engineering is full of unsatisfactory choices...




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: