Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Co-author of the blog post here.

My mistake is to call it FCP. This local benchmark only shows the performance of: - parsing the javascript code - creating the DOM node

That was the only goal.

We should have network simulation for the next update of the blog post to show some additional color. Good idea :thumbsup:

Static + re-hydrating is actually built in Web Components (technically). "Only" tooling like Gatsby or Next.js is missing to make it more developer friendly.



Thanks for clarifying! That's a fair point about web components having the capacity to be statically rendered and re-hydrated.


Would you consider comparing the results of a Lighthouse report?


Sounds good. Like have some sort of generic page with components and look for lighthouse score. I'm adding to the list!


Sweet, thanks!

Feel free to DM me if you need any help. twitter is in bio.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: