So hang on, you're happy to say that you are leaping to his defence because you're sick of some abstract concept against which you rally rather than the facts of the case himself?
There is nothing whatsoever abstract about the things I'm tired of.
This is neither the time nor place to rehash my criticisms. It wouldn't do any good anyway.
My previous comment was For the record. I don't intend to hash it out with you further in this thread.
