Yes it's all about the use case, but I generally don't buy that argument.
First, because the largest ecommerce websites are not SPAs and are generating a shit ton of revenue. Not only Amazon and Ebay but also stuff like Magento and Shopify.
Second, while it can be argued that after a number of clicks the total kbs will be lower by using JSON and rendering on the client, the vast majority of users really care about the initial load. Much like monthly payments, it's generally better to have a consistent 500ms lag than a 3000ms lag on the initial load and then 200ms on every click. Of course I made these numbers to explain my point.
This does not apply to all use cases obviously. In some cases such as an application like Gmail an SPA is completely justified and my arguments do not hold, but in the case of e-commerce I think there are no valid arguments for an SPA.
Exactly! Initial load is IMHO far more important, since as I travel the world some sites (including allmighty new GMail) just won't load. No load, no sale. And maybe perfectly crafted JSON will be very small, but a classic HTML page it's not gonna be much more than that (compared to cached assets).
First, because the largest ecommerce websites are not SPAs and are generating a shit ton of revenue. Not only Amazon and Ebay but also stuff like Magento and Shopify.
Second, while it can be argued that after a number of clicks the total kbs will be lower by using JSON and rendering on the client, the vast majority of users really care about the initial load. Much like monthly payments, it's generally better to have a consistent 500ms lag than a 3000ms lag on the initial load and then 200ms on every click. Of course I made these numbers to explain my point.
This does not apply to all use cases obviously. In some cases such as an application like Gmail an SPA is completely justified and my arguments do not hold, but in the case of e-commerce I think there are no valid arguments for an SPA.