"svn: renames that aren't awful and keep history " No, it was "atomic commits an...

		DannyBee on Jan 25, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: I'm going to slowly move on from Mercurial "svn: renames that aren't awful and keep history " No, it was "atomic commits and single revision number for a change" Remember CVS had non-atomic commits (part of the commit could succeed, part could fail), and per-file version numbers. Disclaimer: I worked a lot on SVN :)

I stand corrected. Will edit my post and credit you.