There is absolutely a truth requirement.

This is why you have to say "I think this person is a murderer" and not "This person is a murderer."

One is opinion. One is fact.

This isn't super hard.

Regulation is forward looking.

How do you hold people accountable for reckless behavior in the past?

A lawsuit is basically the only real thing you can do.

Companies have gotten increasingly comfortable doing deeply unpopular things because they know, so long as the right people make money from it, the worse thing that will happen to them is some people being mean to them on Bluesky.

Right, see, again, giving away the game. It's not about the water (if it was, the objection would be easy to dismiss). Everything is downstream of a populist argument against AI progress.

The loss of income of people displaced by AI may end up eating less meat to survive.

I can think of no product with the Trump name that hasn't proven to be a catastrophic disappointment or scam.

The only thing with trump I like is a hand of bridge.

we started using the term obama for that just because we hate saying that other word

The steaks were probably OK.

The steaks sold through Sharper Image?

The 1989 board game is supposedly an acceptable variation on Monopoly. I guess it's sales were a disappointment for the publisher, but not catastrophic.

I mean, his reality TV show did well. It was awful, but people liked it.

The only evidence we have it was fake news is a statement from the Department of Homeland Security itself - a department which has been repeatedly caught lying in courts of law under this administration.

But I'm sure the statement they gave to a journalist, which hasn't been confirmed by any third-party reporting, was absolutely factual.

Plenty of people have had their social media posts result in extended detention by our border security.

It's absolutely shocking how many people believe other countries lack the means to defend themselves.