Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cheriot's commentslogin

Better commit messages, better and more up to date docs, etc. It's not all slop!

Why would an investment manager choose a CIT over an ETF? I can't help but think there's additional fees being collected somewhere.

To adapt a popular phrase to personal finance, "If you don't understand the product, you are the product."


CITs are cheaper than an ETF, which is why they might be chosen.

This seems like the kind of thing that the right kind of engineer could turn into a lifestyle business. Two mobile apps, two or three browser extensions, a server, and a marketing website. A lot of care for the core security decisions and a bunch of CRUD UIs.

I know I'm being "that guy" so tell me where this gets more complex than I think.


tbh, I do that with Uber/Lyft, too

Thank you, Sunnyvale man, for hitting this edge case before I do.

Interesting way to encourage competition for its competitor. A single, scaled self-driving company is a massive threat to Uber.

During peak hours Waymo is more expensive than standard uber/lyft - I don't pay attention to black/premium pricing. Off-peak the price can be comparable. I mainly check because my wife prefers it.


Anyone know how much harder water resistance gets with replaceable batteries?


Are there good hosted options that will not respond to non-judicial data requests?

Someone is going to say self hosted is better and I don't disagree, but there's limits to how much time I can spend on self hosted stuff.


Protonmail iirc. You can even get documents and photos synced. Not sure how well it works for photos.


Protonmail is widely believed to be compromised and some evidence supporting this has come forth in two separate incidents in the last year.

Protonmail also has gone on record stating that they will comply with legal orders from the Swiss government to spy on and turn over the private data of their users.

https://proton.me/blog/climate-activist-arrest

Swiss law has recently gotten significantly more aggressive in recent years, especially wrt to prosecuting climate activists. Criminal damages for drawing with chalk on pavement, for example...

Look up the "Secret Files Scandal" of 1989 and decide for yourself how comfortable you are with Swiss law.


> Protonmail is widely believed to be compromised and some evidence supporting this has come forth in two separate incidents in the last year.

There has been no evidence of this, stop spreading misinformation. They're clear on what they can and can't hand over and what you can do to reduce the information that they can hand over like billing info. For some inexplicable reason people expect a corporation to disregard legal government warrants and subpoenas. Thinking any company would do this is next level delusion. Even if you self-hosted, you wouldn't be able to escape this because it would just end up with you in jail.

The only protection against that is end to end encryption. And to this day Proton has handed over zero data that falls under their E2EE umbrella.

At best, even if you assumed that they were collecting incoming/outgoing emails before encryption it would be nonsensical to think that this wasn't happening to other providers, it's just the nature of email. Nobody who cares about absolute privacy should be using it as a means of critical communication regardless.

The notion that Proton capitulates and somehow hands over your emails or other encrypted data is false and completely unsubstantiated. Unlike Google on the other hand, who will hand over your entire inbox unencrypted with zero issue to DHS/the FBI merely for writing a letter to an attorney:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/02/03/hom...

https://archive.is/kmWHG


I would put Phrack's reputation up against ProtonMail's 10 times out of 10.

https://redact.dev/blog/proton-mail-journalist-suspensions-c...


Well that's subjective. But Proton's response to that is also valid imo (which is also subjective):

https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1nd07w0/comment/nd...


Compromised how and by whom? In the form of the answer to legally binding Swiss courts subpoenas, or in the sense some other agent(s) have access to their systems and can read the encrypted data?


From the article

> In April 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sent Google an administrative subpoena requesting his data.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: