Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anonthrownaway's commentslogin

/agree (and wondering why this angle of criticism isn't being constantly brought into all discussions of the Siri fail)

Siri isn't lame because of the lack of frontier LLM. Siri is a massive failure of simply coding it to do obvious things, which is a UX failure, which is ironic given Apple's reputation as the UX leaders. I guess it is a low bar considering the competition of MS and Goog.

Over the last 6 years, I have fully bought into the ecosystem and it constantly dissapoints me. I invite the UX team to spend a few days watching me struggle with their fragmented ecosystem. But I warn them to not let me get started on AppleTV (the streaming app), where the enshitification takes the crown over all of their competitors. They seem to have jumped the shark past the give the consumer great value stage.


Apple UX has been swirling around the toilet bowl for over a decade now. It would be sad if it weren't something they've done on purpose.


>The only difference is that the menus, dialogs, file pickers, keyboard shortcuts, and windowing all use native macOS Cocoa APIs.

Why would I want native macOS dialogs where the save as dialog can only show 32 characters on the screen at once? I use LibreOffice on Mac mostly because it allows me to use their dialogs instead of the crap macOS ones...


One big reason is sandboxing - the native dialogs can view the entire filesystem hierarchy and automatically grant access to selected resources to the calling app. Non-native dialogs are restricted to whatever the app has access to, which means you often have to give the apps Full Disk Access to make them work properly.


Good point. I forgot that I had to do that...


Exactly - they do not GAF because there is no worthy competitor. No one else has a (semi) functional ecosystem...


Amazing HW. SW that is stunningly bad. My example that makes me want to divest myself from my all-in on Apple's ecosystem: Native save as dialog box with a filename text box that shows (at most) 32 characters on the screen at once. Even with the smallest dialog box width possible, there is room to make the filename more than 64 characters. Resizing the box does nothing. They can't be eating their own dogfood here right? Are they all using Linux? How do they sell this crap to the business segment?? This isn't even a bug - it is just terrible SW UI/UX design.

I love my Macbook HW (except for the stupid sharp edge) and the only thing that keeps me from ditching it is that for most documents I work on, I am in LibreOffice, which lets me disable the native save as dialog box and use the works as expected LibreOffice one.

To the article, I wonder if a HW person will have the mindset required to fix the glaring holes in their SW. Make the whole damn company eat their own dogfood!


macOS may be stunningly bad, but Windows 11 and any flavor of Linux are far worse.


Parent's workaround was literally to use software frequently found on Linux desktop (and typically absent on MacOS and Windows)

Whatever's going on in Cupertino, it's hard to arguethe people working on the Linux ecossytem don't eat their own dogfood


I know :(

I use all 3 for different reasons, but Macbooks are my daily driver because I want an ecosystem. Too bad there are so many ecosystem fails. I want to believe, but this $4T megacorp can't figure out table stakes.


/Agree

As a long time techie I understand the desire to approach mediation as a programmatic systems problem, but as a mediator, I'd recommend OP work as a volunteer mediator long enough to realize that mediation is ~90% soft skills.


Real world scenario I witnessed recently:

1. subject had a bank account with the ability to link to Zelle

2. subject turned on Zelle to receive money from a family member

3. several high dollar Zelle transactions were made - subject claims that they were at home with covid and no one had access to her phone

4. she calls bank to cancel transactions, bank refunds money

5. bank investigates and claims face id and her IP address was used and takes refunds back

6. subject takes bank and zelle to court

7. Zelle says: we are just a middleman - not our responsibility

8. bank claims that it can't investigate where the money went because it was instant transferred

9. banks settles for some of the money

Conclusion? If you have to use Zelle or Venmo, attach it to a bank account with limited funds in it.


>8. bank claims that it can't investigate where the money went because it was instant transferred

They really couldn't, or their policies didn't allow handing out information without a subpoena? Given KYC laws, I'm sure that every financial institution involved probably has the records somewhere. As for the policy itself, I'm not so sure whether zelle refusing to hand over recipient information is a bad thing. If I'm selling something on facebook marketplace, I wouldn't want my counterparty to get my dox just because they cried foul. I'd want a judge to examine the request before zelle hands over my info.


Your story sounds possible with one exception, 8 "subject threatens to take bank and zelle to court". There is no universe where bank tells the judge it wont investigate.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: