Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Slurpee99's commentslogin

  ... improvements around 25% compared to AV1

  AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding
I'm not sure what these two lines mean or if we can compare them, any help?

I understood it as compression is 25% better : a quality of 10mbps in av1 can be achieved with 8mbps in Av2. But, it needs 5 times more compute power for this 25% gain.

> I'm not sure what these two lines mean or if we can compare them, any help?

AV2 saves 25% bandwidth at the cost of 5x more decoding complexity.


What does "complexity" mean here? Computation required?

Yes, much higher computation required to encode it, and decode it, both.

He only mentioned decode complexity. Would be interesting to know the average encode complexity compared to AV1.

Encoding speed even on Mac Studio is atrocious, it’s in range of single frames per second as opposed to realtime+ for even h265

The specification for AV2 has only been finalised very recently, so performant encoders have not yet been developed. Meaningful comparison to older codecs like H265 and AV1 will only be possible once that has changed. (It'll be slower, but almost certainly not one-frame-per-second slow.)

Getting the full bitrate gains will be slower.

For any specific bitrate and quality target, there's a good chance it'll be faster.


dav1d is the av1 decoder and it’s an insane feat of engineering. Written in assembly, it even eschews the normal c calling convention to get even better performance.

The normal C calling convention is really only for cross-binary calls (e.g. between shared libraries). If you're not doing that you can ignore it; it's not a weird thing to do. It would be odd to strictly follow it in assembly and I assume compilers don't either.

Unfortunately, in absence of inlining, compilers mostly respect calling convention even when they don't have to.


Smaller files but harder to decode

What is this supposed to deliver to their users?


The ability to launder money across borders without any Know-Your-Customer restrictions.


Doubt


Possibly could help with radon poisoning


$29/month isn't really anything until you have 10 tools that are all adding up.

It's always a good idea to be critical of monthly subscriptions, they add up fast.


$290/month is still peanuts if you have employees.


Especially if that $290 improves productivity enough that you need fewer employees.


Of course they can drop, even in [insert your country here] but look worldwide for more extreme examples.


Yeah because those two statements are perfect analogies...


Odds of dying in a jet crash are about 1 in 16 million per flight, odds of dying in a mass shooting in the US by living there for one year and doing random things and going random places are within an order of magnitude of that.

I could have said "car" and "driving" instead and it would have been far more likely.


http://www.ctvnews.ca/bank-of-canada-raises-overnight-rate-t...

> The move, which will likely be a surprise for some, came less than a week after the latest Statistics Canada numbers showed the economy expanded by an impressive 4.5 per cent in the second quarter.

> "Recent economic data have been stronger than expected, supporting the bank's view that growth in Canada is becoming more broadly-based and self-sustaining," the bank said.

> The rate increase means governor Stephen Poloz has now reversed the two cuts he introduced in 2015 to help the economy deal with the plunge in oil prices. The bank said Wednesday the increasingly robust economy shows it no longer needs as much stimulus.

> Others predicted the bank would refrain from moving the rate out of concern such a move would drive up an already strengthening Canadian dollar and pose a risk to exporters.

> In its statement, the bank also said headline and core inflation have seen slight increases since July, largely as expected. It noted, however, that upward pressure on wages and prices remain more subdued than historical trends would suggest, which has also been seen in other advanced economies.


How well does it work for teams? Is there issues for syncing the database if two or more people are using it at the same time?


Works OK for small teams. If a user forgets to close the database then other team members are only able to open it as read-only. My biggest gripe is that you don't know who is holding the write lock. We work around this by using a setting in our keepass client to close the db after a certain amount of time.


Some algae are, and some are not. For example most green algae are still considered plants.


Plants generally aren't grouped with green algae despite them having evolved from a common ancestor. I guess it's a bit like the crustacean/insect division, so maybe I was being a bit too facetious.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: