For the ccc conference rc3, linus said something in direction of 'lets not do that again'.
At least for me, i go to Fosdem for all the talks of course but also to see people, dring belgien beer, eat, freeze, have wet shoes and enjoy the sun on the second day for 1-2 hours.
Either i don't get it or i'm wasting my time doing code review for years now with a surprisingly positive effect which shouldn't be as 'reasoning about code is scam'?
I also reason about code to determine the best language due to features, community size, potential workforce etc.
This. The choice of language should be driven by the 'business' domains/areas you need to cover. Do you need it to be scalable? Do you need security? What type of security do you need? It is the requirements that drive the design, not the other way around. And choice of language is not the requirement.
First you decide 'blue' and 'which blue' then you decide the brand of paint. Not the other way around.
The funny thing is, that when you realise that they just lay it down on the sea floor and you start to think through all the potential issues with throwing a very thick special cable on the ocean, you will realize that it already just works as it is for a while.
For the ccc conference rc3, linus said something in direction of 'lets not do that again'.
At least for me, i go to Fosdem for all the talks of course but also to see people, dring belgien beer, eat, freeze, have wet shoes and enjoy the sun on the second day for 1-2 hours.